|
ETF Experts Look at Tax Efficiency
By John Spence, Associate
Editor
One of the most compelling reasons for investing in exchange-traded
funds is their potential heightened tax efficiency relative to traditional
index mutual funds. Although most ETFs have a relatively short amount
of history behind them, some researchers are already investigating
to see if they have made good on the benefits touted by their proponents.
Brad Zigler, who has headed marketing, research, and education
at the Pacific Exchange and Barclays Global Investors, compared
capital gains distributions and after-tax returns for ETFs and Vanguard
index funds that track several equity asset classes. For the ETFs,
he used Barclays Global Investors' iShares. It's a small set of
data, but it does represent two indexing giants using two different
products to track the same indexes.
|
Capital Gains Distributions, August 2000-August
2001
|
| Index tracked |
ETF
|
Mutual fund
|
| S&P 500 |
0.05%
|
0.00%
|
| S&P MidCap 400 |
0.30%
|
8.54%
|
| Russell 2000 |
0.17%
|
13.64%
|
| S&P 500/Barra Value |
0.24%
|
6.53%
|
| S&P SmallCap 600/Barra Value |
0.44%
|
7.13%
|
| S&P 500/Barra Growth |
0.16%
|
0.00%
|
| S&P SmallCap 600/Barra Growth |
0.81%
|
5.24%
|
| Average |
0.31%
|
5.87%
|
Source: Bloomberg, table appeared in the
May, 2002 issue of Financial Planning Magazine
Capital Gains: total of both short-term and long-term capital
gains distributions, expressed as a percentage of NAV
|
After-Tax Returns, August 2000-August
2001
|
| Index tracked |
ETF
|
Mutual fund
|
| S&P 500 |
-24.65%
|
-24.67%
|
| S&P MidCap 400 |
-8.63%
|
-11.10%
|
| Russell 2000 |
-12.66%
|
-14.66%
|
| S&P 500/Barra Value |
-8.79%
|
-10.04%
|
| S&P SmallCap 600/Barra Value |
15.74%
|
13.16%
|
| S&P 500/Barra Growth |
-37.98%
|
-38.11%
|
| S&P SmallCap 600/Barra Growth |
-17.15%
|
-17.23%
|
Source: Bloomberg, table appeared in the
May, 2002 issue of Financial Planning Magazine
It should be noted that the results above cover a short time period,
August 2000 to August 2001.
Zigler points out that mutual funds are almost always fully invested,
and therefore keep little cash on hand to meet shareholder redemptions.
The fund must sell securities to pay out the redemptions, which
triggers capital gains distributions for those who remain in the
fund (unless the fund is held in a tax-deferred account). Zigler
notes that many fund investors were hit with a double whammy during
the market downturn: their mutual funds dropped in value yet they
were hit with capital gains triggered by fellow fund investor redemptions.
However, several Vanguard funds experienced positive inflows during
the bear market and haven't had to sell stock to meet shareholder
redemptions.
In simple terms, ETF investors are insulated from the selling of
shares by other investors in the fund. Exchange-traded funds redeem
shares "in kind" in a sort of barter system that doesn't
involve actual selling shares and resultant capital gains.
ETFs are also able to eliminate low-cost-basis stock, or shares
purchased cheaply that have since risen in price, during redemptions.
This feature also bolsters ETF tax efficiency. As another example,
at the end of 2001 Barclays Global Investors announced zero year-end
capital gains distributions for all domestic and 11 international
iShares.
However, ETFs do make capital gains distributions when shares are
sold to reflect index rebalancings, just like index funds. Some
ETFs and index funds are optimized samples of an index and can therefore
adjust holdings in the absence of a real index rebalance.
The index fund vs. ETF tax efficiency debate is likely to continue
until researchers have enough data to make meaningful comparisons,
perhaps even three or five years worth. The two vehicles are different
enough that they will likely appeal to different types of investors.
Certainly, ETFs do have disadvantages, such as broker commissions,
bid/ask spreads, and premiums and discounts. However, the structure
of ETFs and the limited data so far suggests they can deliver on
their tax efficiency claims.
05/08/2002
For Part 2 of this article, click here.
Printer
Friendly Page E-mail
to a Friend
|