|
Enhanced
Indexing
By
John Spence, Associate
Editor
There
wasn't a lot of emphasis placed on enhanced indexing during the
bull market of the 1990s when investors were fed a steady diet of
consecutive and unprecedented high yearly returns. However, with
the recent stock sell-off, squeezing out those extra percentage
points can make a difference, and is causing many investors to explore
the risks and benefits associated with enhanced indexing.
How Does Enhanced
Indexing Work?
Managers who use an
enhanced indexing strategy seek to outperform an index through a
limited amount of active management. There are two approaches to
enhanced indexing: the stock-selection strategy and the derivatives-based,
or synthetic, strategy.
Stock-selection is the
more simplistic of the two strategies that employs a regulated amount
of active management and stock-picking by a fund manager. To be
considered an "enhanced indexing" strategy, it is commonly
held that tracking error should not exceed 2.00%. But generally,
the fund manager will utilize quantitative analysis and research
to identify stocks or sectors that may outperform, and overweight
in those stocks or sectors. As is true with all active management,
a major hurdle is overcoming transaction costs.
The second approach
that is becoming more widespread - the synthetic strategy - uses
derivative contracts in an attempt to outperform the returns of
the index. A common form of synthetic enhanced indexing involves
owning futures, which is in a sense a "buy now, pay later"
approach. For example, margin rates for S&P 500 futures currently
run about 5% of the total contract value. The remaining 95% of the
investment can then be placed in short-term fixed income investments.
The trick is to outperform the London InternBank Offered Rate (LIBOR)
with the fixed income investments. LIBOR is the financing rate associated
with S&P 500 futures, so returns above LIBOR lead to enhanced
performance.This is just one example of the many complicated strategies
used in synthetic enhanced indexing. Also, many managers combine
the stock-picking and synthetic strategies in a hybrid approach.
The standard by which
enhanced indexers measure themselves is Information Ratio, which
is determined by dividing the excess return percentage by the tracking
error percentage. An enhanced index fund manager with a relatively
high Information Ratio is considered successful.
Does Enhanced Indexing
Work?
Wiesenberger, a division
of Thompson Financial, today released a study that examined the
performance of 40 enhanced index funds, 24 of which were based on
the S&P 500. Wiesenberger compared the enhanced index fund returns
against their respective indexes for the life of each fund. To see
how the enhanced index funds reacted to the recent market downturn,
they performed the same analysis over the period between March and
November 2000. All performance data was calculated as of 11/30/2000.
Performance Over
Fund Lifetime
|
Index
tracked
|
Sector
|
No.
of funds
|
No.
of funds outperformed
|
No.
of funds underperformed
|
%
success |
|
S&P
500
|
Large
Cap
|
24
|
12
|
12
|
50.00%
|
|
S&P
400
|
Mid
Cap
|
3
|
2
|
1
|
66.66%
|
|
S&P
600
|
Small
Cap
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
50%
|
|
Russell
1000 Growth
|
Small
Cap Growth
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0.00%
|
|
Russell
100 Value
|
Small
Cap Value
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0.00%
|
|
Nasdaq
100
|
Technology
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
100.00%
|
|
Lehman
Bros. Aggregate Bond
|
General
Bond
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0.00%
|
|
Lehman
Bros. Gov/Corp
|
Gov/Corp
Bond
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0.00%
|
|
Blend
- 60% S&P 500, 40% Lehman Bros. Agg. Bond
|
Hybrid
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
0.00%
|
Source:
Wiesenberger study - Enhanced Index Funds or In Need of Enhancement
Fund Performance,
March-November 2000
|
Index
tracked
|
Sector
|
No.
of funds
|
No.
of funds outperformed
|
No.
of funds underperformed
|
%
success |
|
S&P
500
|
Large
Cap
|
23*
|
10
|
13
|
41.66%
|
|
S&P
400
|
Mid
Cap
|
3
|
0
|
3
|
0.00%
|
|
S&P
600
|
Small
Cap
|
2
|
0
|
2
|
0.00%
|
|
Russell
1000 Growth
|
Small
Cap Growth
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
100.00%
|
|
Russell
100 Value
|
Small
Cap Value
|
1
|
1
|
0
|
100.00%
|
|
Nasdaq
100
|
Technology
|
1*
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
n/a
|
|
Lehman
Bros. Aggregate Bond
|
General
Bond
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0.00%
|
|
Lehman
Bros. Gov/Corp
|
Gov/Corp
Bond
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0.00%
|
|
Blend
- 60% S&P 500, 40% Lehman Bros. Agg. Bond
|
Hybrid
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
50.00%
|
*The PaineWebber
Enhanced S&P 500 Index Fund and the Nasdaq 100 Index Fund didn't
exist during the period between March and November 2000
Source: Wiesenberger study - Enhanced Index Funds or In
Need of Enhancement
The most striking thing
about the results of the study is the lack of any conclusive proof
that one type of enhanced index fund outperforms its peers. The
size, name, enhanced strategy, or experience of a fund family did
not have a big impact on the results of the study. For example,
the 12 funds that outperformed the S&P 500 over their lifetimes
employed diverse approaches to enhanced indexing. There doesn't
appear to be a correlation between one type of strategy and an increased
likelihood that it will beat its index.
Additionally, Wiesenberger
found no correlation between a fund's degree of success and the
type of index tracked, or the index's own performance. It is also
interesting to note that over half of the funds that beat the index
over their lifetime lagged the index between March and November
2000.
The age of a fund does
not appear to affect the likelihood that it will outperform its
index. The 19 funds that outperformed the index over their lifetime
had an average age of 5.45 years, while the 21 funds that lagged
the index had an average age of 5.55 years.
Generally, the findings
of the study seem to support the idea that enhanced indexing shares
many characteristics with active management. Although some managers
will beat the index, it's difficult to identify in advance who those
managers might be because there is no conclusive proof that one
type of enhanced index fund will outperform the next.
12/21/2000
|