 |
Betting
on Sector ETFs in a Highly-Valued Market
By
Max Isaacman, Contributing
Writer
As
one who sold stocks to investors in the early 1970s, I realize how
misleading price/earnings multiples (P/E) can be. Although these
multiples have their limitations, P/Es can be useful when making
valuations. Still, other valuations should be used in conjunction
with P/Es to paint a broader picture.
Even with the current high P/Es and taking other valuations into
account, exchange-traded funds (ETFs) should be bought with long-term
appreciation in mind. This article will focus specifically on the
Standard & Poor's (S&P)
500 (SPY), the S&P MidCap 400 (MDY), and some of the sector
SPDRs.
As far as size, S&P considers companies valued at $5.0 billion
and larger to be large-cap companies, and therefore suitable for
SPY. Small-cap companies are those valued at $1.0 billion and smaller.
Mid-cap companies are classified as those somewhere in between.
Of the sector SPDRs, I find the Energy Sector SPDR (XLE), the Financial
Sector SPDR (XLF), and, for patient value-oriented investors, the
Basic Industries Sector (XLB) to be particularly useful.
Selecting an index
that represents the stock market
The S&P 500 provides
a broad representation of the stock market. The roots of this index
started back in 1928, but the index as we know it today was developed
in the late 1950s. At the time it was formulated it was designed
to be an all-encompassing benchmark, reflecting the U.S. equities
market. The index includes more than 100 industries in 11 economic
sectors. The strategists at Standard & Poor's constantly revise
the S&P 500 so that it continues to be an accurate representation
of the stock market.
When an old-economy company in the index is to be replaced, strategists
at S&P do not replace it with a new-economy stock because they
think that a hot technology stock has more appreciation potential.
S&P is not about guessing which sectors or industries will appreciate
the most. There are restrictions on the stocks that S&P can
use, and how often changes can be made. This keeps the indexes from
becoming too aggressive.
MDY and SPY are a reflection on the domestic markets, and include
only companies that are U.S.-based. Also, the companies are required
to have sufficient float, so that the funds based on these indexes
can invest in the company. To be a part of the index, the company
must also experience positive earnings or cash flow. Also, not more
than 50 % of the shares of the selected companies can be held by
management or insiders. Naturally, these criteria exclude many dot-com
companies in the technology sector.
Is the S&P 500
realistically priced?
Some analysts believe
SPY is selling at too high a valuation. SPY currently sells at about
25 times forward earnings. This is historically a high P/E, escpecially
when considering that for most of the past 25 years the index has
had a multiple somewhere in the teens. But this valuation can be
justified by changes the index has experienced. One should keep
in mind that the multiple is not the only gauge to measure an index's
value.
Many analysts today use a P/E to Growth Ratio (PEG). Using this
ratio allows one to measure a company's P/E more in line with its
growth rate. The mathematical expression of this ratio is given
as a variation from 1.0; 1.0 is considered a "fair" value.
The lower the number from 1.0, the greater the discount from fair
value. As an example of this calculation, suppose that a stock sells
at 10 times earnings, and has a 10% earnings per share growth rate
- its PEG ratio is 1.0. A stock at 20 times earnings with a 10%
earnings growth rate has a 2.0 PEG, twice its fair value.
According to Sam Stovall at S&P, the SPY PEG ratio, calculated
to the ETF's projected five-year growth rate, is 1.4 times. This
figure does not seem as high in light of SPY's growth bias.
SPY - active growth
fund?
Over the last 36 years, 740 companies have dropped out of the SPY.
This is a rate of about 20 companies per year, or roughly 1.5 companies
per month. That's a high frequency of change in a portfolio - bordering
on active account management.
In a recent report, Douglas Cote at Aeltus Investment Management
points out that the trend toward the number of company changes in
SPY has accelerated. Cote reports that there were 89 portfolio changes
in 1999, and 59 changes from January 1, 2000 through July 27, 2000
- a sharp increase indeed.
Next
>>
Printer
Friendly Page E-Mail
to a Friend
|
 |
|