 |
Lee
Kranefuss Interview
By
Jim Wiandt, Managing Editor
Lee
Kranefuss, CEO of U.S. Individual Investor Business at Barclays
Global Investors, recently sat down with IndexFunds.com's Jim Wiandt
to discuss the proliferation of iShares and the future of exchange-traded
funds (ETFs).
IF.com: What
do you see as the most significant benefits of investing with exchange-traded
funds (ETFs)?
LK: It's really the fact that they're a combination of the
features of stocks and funds. You're getting the professional management
and diversification you'd expect with a fund and, at the same time,
you're getting the portability and flexibility of a stock you can
buy and sell at any brokerage account. And in many dimensions, the
fact that you can buy and sell it during the day if you use margin
or short dimensions, for example hedging, you're able to do those
as well. You can borrow against it. So it's really the best of both
worlds.
IF.com: What do you see as situations where investors might
do better with a traditional open-ended mutual fund?
LK: Probably the simplest situation is if you're doing very
small dollar cost averaging as a starting-out investor. Unless you're
in an account with unlimited trading privileges, you're going to
pay a transaction charge, a commission every time you buy and sell.
So if you're putting in $200, even then an $18 trade is a big piece
of it. So ETFs are probably not right for the small dollar cost
averagers or starting-out investor. They're for somebody who already
has a reasonable portfolio of stocks and/or funds and needs to look
at ETFs as a fair alternative.
IF.com: Has Barclays looked at any way to get into the 401(k)
market, or is it just that the structure's not friendly to it?
LK: Well, I don't know if it's friendly or unfriendly. Right
now we are concentrating on getting out there to the retail and
institutional markets and over time we'll look more carefully at
how we could get into some of the other markets, if it makes sense.
IF.com: Is Barclay's working to narrow ETF premiums and discounts
underlying net asset value(NAV)? Are you satisfied with the levels
of transparency?
LK: There's a lot of misinformation about what goes on and
the importance of current price or last trade versus net asset value.
If I could take a couple minutes, I'll take you through a little
bit of some of the practical issues that go into that and why that
may not be as big a concern as some have made it out to be.
The first thing to know is that NAV is cut at 4:00 p.m. EST on most
funds. But there's no reason it has to be. As far as I know, it's
done that way by convention because that is the last trade of the
major exchanges for stock. The first thing to note about this is
that ETFs continue trading; I think all U.S. ETFs trade until 4:15.
So if a fund is active and it's got a lot of trades going on . .
.
Next
>>
Printer
Friendly Page E-Mail
to a Friend
|
 |
|