Exclusive
Interview: Prof. William Sharpe Page
2
The
dominant factors that tend to predict relatively strong
future performance in order of importance:
- Low
expenses
- Low
turnover
- Good
past performance
"The
growth/return side is very hard to predict, but costs
are easy to predict," he said.
"It
is important to understand that if you think that index
funds will beat Treasury bills by 6% and you pay 1%
in fees, then you have given away about 17% of the advantage
of taking equity market risk," he said.
"Some
people who are really superior could add enough value
to offset the costs," he said. The trick is separating
the truly superior from the simply lucky. "It's really
hard to tell what the benefits will be."
"Don't
expect much persistence," he said. "The one area where
past performance is helpful is if the fund is really
rotten -- usually due to high expenses." Abysmal performance
tends to signal poor future performance.
"Increasingly
you have to help people do the arithmetic," he said,
such as "how much will it cost me if I pay 1%?"
This
is one reason he founded Financial Engines, whose Web
site at www.financialengines.com lets
investors see how basic allocation decisions affect
outcomes based on currently available data. In real
time the site runs Monte Carlo simulations after putting
in risk thresholds, expected retirement age, and other
factors. The current service is directed at corporate
401-K plans where employees have a limited number of
fund options, but additional services are planned.
<<Previous Next
>>
Printer
Friendly Page