| ETF
Industry Poised for Next Round of Growth
IndexFunds.com Staff
May 27, 2003 |
|
The exchange-traded fund universe is expanding - at last count
growing to 135 ETFs trading in the U.S. with over $112 billion
in assets under management. Likewise, in the coming weeks we'll
be enhancing our own editorial coverage of ETFs with more frequent
news stories and features on these funds.
Although ETFs have experienced tremendous growth since the mid-1990s,
they certainly have not sent traditional indexed mutual funds
the way of the dodo, as some pundits predicted they quickly would.
For comparison's sake, retail index fund king Vanguard (which
has introduced ETFs as separate share classes of its index funds)
as of April 2003 had $200 billion in indexed assets under management
spread over 40 index funds.
An estimated $1 trillion is indexed to the domestic equity market,
mainly in private accounts for pension plans and other institutional
investors. ETF assets at this point are still a drop in the bucket
when compared to the mutual fund industry as a whole.
However, increasing numbers of advisors and investors are taking
advantage of the unique benefits of ETFs. As a prelude to our
stepped-up coverage, here we'll take a look at some of the main
advantages (and also disadvantages) of ETFs, how investors and
advisors use them, and what's next for ETFs. This article also
contains links to several previous articles that deal with some
of the more advanced topics on ETFs.
ETF Benefits
Active/passive debate
Like traditional index funds, existing ETFs attempt to track
- not beat - the performance of a given benchmark, providing both
diversity and low cost. Countless studies have illustrated that
a majority of active fund managers fail to beat their relevant
benchmarks in most equity categories over longer time periods.
Percentage of Active Open-End Fund Managers
That Outperformed Benchmark (15 Years Ended 12/31/02)
| |
Value |
Blend |
Growth |
| Large |
10% |
22% |
44% |
| Mid |
27% |
45% |
39% |
| Small |
33% |
42% |
81% |
Source: Morgan Stanley
Equity Research (Russell indexes were used for comparisons -
Russell 1000 series for large, Russell Midcap series for mid,
and Russell 2500 for small)
Cost
A fund's expenses can have a significant impact on the returns
of long-term investors, probably more so than most investors realize.
To illustrate the importance of costs, we used the SEC's mutual
fund cost calculator.
Imagine an investor with a long time horizon of 25 years has
$10,000 to invest in a fund. Assuming a 10% average annual return
(let's be optimistic) and a 1.5% expense ratio, at the end of
25 years this investor will be left with over $74,000, according
to the SEC cost calculator. However, that same $10,000 invested
in a fund with an expense ratio of 0.5% would grow to over $95,000,
all other factors being equal.
| Expenses of ETFs vs.
Open-End Mutual Funds |
| Category |
Average expense ratio |
| Exchange-Traded Funds |
| U.S. Major Market ETFs |
0.18% |
| U.S. Style ETFs |
0.23% |
| U.S. Sector ETFs |
0.34% |
| All U.S. Equity ETFs |
0.28% |
| International Equity ETFs |
0.41% |
| All Equity ETFs |
0.40% |
| Fixed Income ETFs |
0.15% |
| Open-end
Mutual Funds |
| Actively Managed Domestic Equity |
1.40% |
| Actively Managed International Equity |
1.94% |
| Passive/Indexed Domestic Equity |
0.75% |
| Passive/Indexed International Equity |
0.95% |
| Passive/Indexed Fixed Income |
0.39% |
Source: Morgan Stanley Equity Research
Tax efficiency
ETFs are inherently tax efficient because, like index funds,
they track a benchmark and have lower turnover than active funds.
However, ETF in-kind redemptions offer further tax protection
from capital gains.
Tax strategies
Financial advisors use ETFs for sophisticated index fund tax-swap
strategies to maintain equity exposure while offsetting realized
or unrealized gains in a portfolio. The broad universe of ETFs
allows investors to "swap" into similar ETFs to maximize
tax efficiency and maintain market exposure while avoiding violation
of the wash-sale
rule.
ETF Disadvantages
As shown in the figure above, in many cases ETFs have lower expense
ratios than comparable index funds. However, there's more than
meets the eye. Since ETFs trade like stocks, they are subject
to brokerage fees and trading spreads. Therefore, ETFs are not
effective for dollar cost averaging small amounts over time, and
likewise any strategy using ETFs must account for these additional
costs.
However, the tax and cost advantages of ETFs become more attractive
to those investors who have a significant lump sum to invest and
a long time horizon.
What's Next?
The ETF industry appears poised for a new round of expansion
in the coming months and years - possibly new fixed-income ETFs,
options on more existing ETFs, and equity funds tracking increasingly
sophisticated benchmarks.
For example, Rydex recently introduced a new fund tied to an
equal-weighted S&P 500 that will automatically rebalance quarterly.
PowerShares Capital Management last month launched two ETFs that
track proprietary "dynamic" equity indexes managed by
the American Stock Exchange. The new funds appear to be the next
step toward actively managed ETFs, although fund providers have
a host of regulatory issues to deal with before such products
hit the market. However, leveraged ETFs as well as inverse ETFs
designed to move in the opposite direction of an index could hit
the market sooner.
Finally, many industry observers are awaiting the launch of new
Vanguard VIPERs ETFs once Vanguard's equity index funds complete
their transition to new U.S. MSCI benchmarks.