Vanguard
or TIAA-CREF - Which one for the Little Guy?
By
Jonathan Kandell, Contributing
Writer
Vanguard is often touted as the fund company of choice for
the small, no-nonsense index investor. Vanguard is a terrific
company, but it is really set up to favor the investor with
over $50,000 who doesn't have to pay the custodial charges
and index fees. While these fees are fair in terms of the
higher costs of administering small accounts, they still
represent a competitive disadvantage. TIAA-CREF, a comparable
mutual fund company, offers many funds that can be a better
deal for the small investor.[1]
"What our
fee structure does is recognize the efficiencies of the larger
accounts. Those responsible for efficiencies should be the beneficiaries
of them. As it is, it takes the fund years to break even at
the lower account levels. The point of our fees is that it's
a fairer allocation of cost. You're really subsidizing the smaller
investor. If you incur costs, you should have to pay for them.
. . Also, in a taxable account, if you intend to switch when
you hit the $10,000 threshold, the tax consequences could be
significant."
-Brian
Mattes, Principal, The Vanguard Group |
|
"The significance
of low expenses is simple to explain - they result in more
money going to work for investors. Therefore, whether talking
about small or large investors, TIAA-CREF believes that they
appreciate having more money wind up in their accounts, rather
than with fund companies. Even for small investors, the impact
of expenses can be dramatic, particularly over long periods
of time. And, since small investors will have less earnings
in terms of actual dollars, they should look to keep as many
of them as possible by investing in low-cost funds."
-Tom
Pinto, Director, Media Relations, TIAA-CREF
|
Fees and Expense
Ratios
Vanguard charges investors a $10 maintenance fee per year on each
index fund with less than $10,000 of assets. There is an additional
$10 IRA custodial fee for each fund with less than $5,000 unless
total assets are more than $50,000. So one's total fees will amount
to either $10 or $20 per fund per year depending on the size of
one's investments.
While TIAA-CREF does
not charge either of these fees, its funds have higher expense
ratios (ERs) than Vanguard's across the board. Expense ratio
costs come straight out of returns. So in comparing funds
the question becomes, "At what point do the expected
higher returns resulting from a lower expense ratio make
up for the added fees?"
IRA Accounts
Let's use the total stock market funds as an example. Vanguard's
Total Stock Market Index Fund has an ER of 20 basis points.
TIAA-CREF's equivalent fund, its Equity Index Fund, has
an ER of 26 basis points. At what level of total net assets
does the 6 basis points difference equal the equivalent
of the $10/$20 in fees? Simple arithmetic shows the TIAA-CREF
expense ratio will be less than the Vanguard fees until
assets in the fund are $10,000 or more (6 basis points x
$10,000 = $6).[2] At less than this, you save more by not
paying fees than you make in lower expenses, and vice versa.
In other words, until your IRA Total Stock Market Fund allocation
reaches $10,000 use TIAA-CREF's Equity Index Fund. After
that point, roll over to Vanguard.
Let's look at
the two short-term bond funds. Vanguard's Short-term Bond
Index Fund has an ER of 20 basis points. TIAA-CREF's Short-Term
Bond Fund has an ER of 30 basis points. At what point does
the 10 basis point difference break even with the $10/$20
fees? 10 basis points is equal to $10 when assets are $10,000.[3]
So, again, if your short-term bond allocation is less than
$10,000 use TIAA-CREF. After that point roll over to Vanguard.
TIAA-CREF's
equity funds, aside from its Equity Index Fund, use a "dual
investment strategy." Part of the fund tracks the index
and the rest is managed. The fund manager has the flexibility
of keeping between 20 and 80% of the fund under enhanced
passive management or under active management. While the
merits of this strategy are debatable in general terms,
it doesn't cost the investor anything at the low expenses
TIAA-CREF offers, and may even add value. A TIAA-CREF official
noted that most of the equity funds are currently about
50/50 active/passive.
Using the same
reasoning, here is a run-down of where various other funds
break-even.[4]
Figure
1: Break-even point for various funds
when you should switch from TIAA-CREF to Vanguard
| Type
of fund |
ER
TIAA-CREF |
ER
Vang. |
IRA
Break-even |
| Total
Stock Market |
26
(TCEIX)
|
20
(VTSMX)
|
$10,000
|
| International
equity |
49
(TIINX)
|
34
(VGTSX)
|
$6,667
|
| Social
Choice Equity |
27
(TCSCX)
|
25
(VCSIX)
|
$10,000
|
| Total
Bond |
30
(TIPBX)
|
20
(VBMSX)
|
$10,000
|
| Short-term
bond |
30
(TCSTX)
|
20
(VBISX)
|
$10,000
|
So, in short,
with the exception of international, TIAA-CREF is a wiser
place to invest for the IRA investor with less than $10,000
per fund. IRA investors should start with TIAA-CREF and
switch to Vanguard once their funds get above the figures
in the chart above.[5] Depending on how many funds one has,
the amount of money saved could be significant.
Taxable Fund
Accounts
Because of capital gains, taxable accounts are more complicated
than the above straightforward analysis. Most small investors
intend to become large investors eventually. If you want
to use TIAA-CREF as a small investor and Vanguard as a large
investor, then you will have to pay the cost of switching.
The loss of compounding capital to taxation incurred in
switching funds would almost certainly drown out any of
the above savings in fees. This effectively means that with
taxable accounts, one should stick with the original company
until redemption, and this changes the economics of comparison.
The decision
on which company to chose for these funds depends essentially
on one's time-horizon. Long-term investors who start with
Vanguard will lose out on the fees until the fund reaches
$10,000 ($6,667 in the case of the international equity
funds), and then start saving from that point on.[6] But
because it takes time for the Vanguard ER gains to overcome
the accumulated and compounded fee losses, the actual break-even
figure will be higher than those in the chart. To be more
precise, the actual "break-even" point depends
on the size of one's original investment, the rate of return,
and the ER spread.[7]
Figure 2: Total Stock Market, one-time investment of
$5000
Time-horizon when it pays to start with Vanguard over TIAA-CREF
| Avg
Ann Ret |
Break-Even
(years) |
Peak
Difference (years) |
|
8%
|
24
|
10
|
|
11%
|
18
|
7
|
|
20%
|
10
|
4
|
Figure
3: Bond Funds, one-time investment of $5000
Time-horizon when it pays to start with Vanguard over TIAA-CREF
| Avg
Ann Ret |
Break-Even
(years) |
Peak
Difference (years) |
|
3%
|
39
|
27
|
|
5%
|
23
|
16
|
|
20%
|
16
|
11
|
As can be seen
by these charts, the number of years it takes to justify
starting with Vanguard is surprisingly large. As we might
expect, the higher the rate of expected return, the lower
the break-even point. These figures assume even regular
returns and that money is not added to the original investment.
Diversification
TIAA-CREF doesn't offer small or value funds, so you need
to use Vanguard if you are concerned with those classes
(although the International Equity fund is 33% small). TIAA-CREF
does not offer various other funds available at Vanguard
either. However, I would argue it is hard to justify complex
"slice and dice" beyond broad categories for small
investors. Frankly, the hypothetical benefits of subdividing
into classes more esoteric than the broad asset categories
of Long- and Short-term Bond, Cash, Domestic Equity, and
International Equity found at TIAA-CREF are dubious at small
amounts.
In fact, if
you take fund minimums into account, TIAA-CREF allows more
meaningful diversification for the beginning investor. TIAA-CREF
has rock-bottom minimums on both IRA and non-IRA accounts:
$250 per fund (less if you pay in paycheck installments).
This is in comparison to Vanguard's $1000 minimums for IRAs
and $3000 for regular accounts. So the small investor can
divide into many more funds with the same assets at TIAA-CREF
in comparison to what they could do at Vanguard, and they
can do it without the expense of annual maintenance fees.
Summary
- With funds
that are tax-sheltered, use TIAA-CREF until amount gets
above $10,000 (listed in Figure
1), then roll over to Vanguard's equivalent fund.
- With funds
in one's taxable accounts, use TIAA-CREF if your time
horizon is in the range shown in Figure 2 (although the
TIAA-CREF advantage decreases as fund assets get beyond
$10,000, and if you plan to regularly add to the accounts,
the time horizon will shrink to the time your account
reaches $10,000).
- Do not slice
and dice beyond broad asset categories until your accounts
get reasonably large.
- If you have
other reasons for preferring one company over another,
don't sweat it, since the savings are relatively modest
and both companies are respected, no-nonsense, customer-friendly
businesses with fierce loyalty from their investors.
1) Vanguard
does of course offer its collection of Life Strategy funds,
offering fixed mixtures of funds, with low fees. However,
this article is aimed at the investor who likes to create
their own multi-fund portfolios.
2) 0.06/100
> [($10 if less than $5000 + $10 if less than 10,000)
/ x] when
x = $10,000.
3)
0.10/100 > [($10 if less than $5000 + $10 if less than
10,000)/x] when x=$10,000
4) Some of TIAA-CREF's
funds are not considered in this analysis because of questions
of asset comparability. The TIAA-CREF Inflation Protected
Securities fund, for instance, is available only to certain
investors. The TIAA-CREF REIT fund is also not comparable,
since it owns direct real estate rather than being an index
of REIT stocks. Both of these TIAA-CREF funds are also annuities
and do not function like a traditional mutual fund. Other
funds, like the growth and income and managed allocation,
cannot necessarily be compared because of differences in
allocation strategy between the two companies, and the fact
that Vanguard only charges some fees on it's index funds
and not its actively managed funds. The break-even point
is relatively low on these two funds anyway, so one is probably
wiser to use Vanguard.
5) The above
analysis makes the following assumptions: (1) The returns
of the Russell 3000 is equivalent to the Wilshire 5000,
(2) both companies add equal value through their trading
strategies, (3) TIAA-CREF's ERs won't go up, (4) TIAA-CREF's
"dual investment strategy" doesn't hurt or help
returns above what's reflected in the ERs, (5) the fees
you save come out of your investment budget, i.e. is invested
and not used for a sandwich.
6) Given there is no custodial fee at Vanguard on taxable
accounts, it is somewhat surprising that Figure 1 applies
identically as it did with IRAs. It turns out that because
all the break-even points are above the point where Vanguard
charges its custodial fee, the break-even points for taxable
investments are identical to the tax-preferenced, despite
the different fee structure.
7) These
tables were constructed from an Excel spreadsheet which
assumed the W5000/R3000 had returns listed. The Vanguard
totals were calculated by taking the ER off the top and
then subtracting pertinent fees and reinvesting remaining
returns. The TIAA-CREF totals were calculated by taking
the ER off the top and reinvesting returns. For each year,
total assets were compared between the two funds. "Peak
difference" represents the number of years at which
the difference was at its maximum (when funds reached $10,000).
The "break-even" point, the point representing
the time-horizon one should use in calculating, represents
the number of years where Vanguard's ER advantage finally
eats up the savings in fees.
11/15/00