|
|
![]() |
Many academics have earned Nobel Prizes for their research and explanation of how stock markets work. Their findings lack bias, as these Nobel Laureates aren't trying to earn a commission or sell magazines and newspapers. More than a hundred years of academic research points to index funds as an investor's best investment. Sadly, the great majority of investors have never read these academic studies, and continue to actively invest.2.1 IntroductionOne of the biggest hurdles investors face is knowing where to access
reliable, non-biased stock market research that will point them in the
right direction for investing appropriately. Because Nobel laureates
have neither the budget nor the intellectual inclination to hire pricey
Madison Avenue advertising agencies to promote their astute findings,
most investors are unaware of the mountains of peer-reviewed research
on investing. Additionally, because their findings run counter to the
siren songs for active trading, played by the dozens of brokerage houses
churning billions of dollars, investors who want to know
the truth have to dig a lot deeper than CNBC.
Quotes
" Sooner than I dared expect, my explicit prayer has been answered. There is coming to market... something called the First Index Investment Trust.... offering extremely low portfolio turnover; and best of all, giving the broadest diversification needed to maximize mean return with minimum portfolio variance and volatility." Newsweek Magazine, August 1976, also"It is not easy to get rich in Las Vegas, at Churchill Downs, or at the local Merrill Lynch office. "
" Most of my investments are in equity index funds." BusinessWeek and "Why pay people to gamble with your money? "
Question: So investors shouldn't delude themselves about beating the market? Answer: "They're just not going to do it. It's just not going to happen."
Question: I wonder if I might ask you, ...how do you think people should invest for the future...? Should they buy index funds? Answer: "Absolutely. I have often said, and I know this will get some of your readers mad, that any pension fund manager who doesn't have the vast majority—and I mean 70% or 80% of his or her portfolio—in passive investments is guilty of malfeasance, nonfeasance or some other kind of bad feasance! There's just no sense for most of them to have anything but a passive investment policy."
|
|
|